"Falsification Analytics — Testing what the evidence actually supports."
KGA Digital provides independent analysis for research, hypotheses, proposals, and complex problems — using a structured human-AI process to challenge assumptions, identify failure points, and determine what the available evidence can actually support.
The AI chatbots available to the average user are extraordinarily capable tools. But like any tool, the quality of their output depends on how they are used — and on the user's ability to recognize when a confident answer is incomplete, unsupported, or wrong.
AI can produce polished, convincing language around weak evidence, carry an incorrect assumption through an otherwise sound analysis, or combine information from different fields without recognizing where their standards, terminology, or conclusions conflict. The result can look professional while containing problems that neither the AI nor the user notices — and it rarely arrives as an obvious hallucination.
KGA Digital was built around that problem.
Dissertations and dissertation proposals, particularly before committee review or defense.
Notice: Before considering this service, confirm that AI-assisted external review is permitted under your institution, department, and program policies.
LLM/AI/AGI research papers, technical reports, preprints, position papers, alignment and AI-safety arguments.
Research papers and interpretive analyses involving archaeological evidence, construction hypotheses, chronology, methodology, or competing explanations.
The same approach can examine multidisciplinary research, business and technical proposals, funding arguments, AI-generated analysis, and other complex problems where different sources, disciplines, or forms of reasoning must be brought together and tested.
The analytical process has also been tested against deliberately flawed research designed to appear plausible while containing unsupported assumptions and an unfalsifiable central claim.
The purpose was simple: would the process challenge the argument — or help make a bad argument sound better?
View the Falsification Test →Doctoral dissertations, substantial proposals, and manuscripts requiring extended analysis.
Short papers, hypotheses, position papers, and narrowly defined analytical questions.
Research papers, technical reports, preprints, interpretive analyses, and document-wide reviews.
Final scope and price are established after an initial review of the submitted material. No payment is required until the project is accepted and the scope and price have been agreed upon. You can generally expect a response within 24 to 48 hours.
A limited number of pro-bono focused reviews are available each month, prioritized by how well-scoped the submission is. If cost is a barrier, describe your situation briefly in the submission — no financial documentation required.
A decision to accept or decline a project is not a judgment of its validity. It reflects whether the analytical process is likely to add meaningful value to it.
Your submitted documents and research are treated as confidential. Materials are used only for the purpose of completing the analytical engagement you requested and are not intentionally disclosed, published, or used to train external AI models. For projects involving unpublished research or proprietary information, KGA Digital is willing to review and sign a reasonable client-provided NDA before any protected materials are submitted.
Once the review is complete and any deliverable has been returned, you may request deletion of your submitted materials, subject to any limited retention required for legal, security, or administrative purposes.
If you've reviewed the pricing and service areas, you can submit your project for review.